Building security does not end with a burglar-resistant door. In an increasingly uncertain world, there are cases where threats far exceed a burglar's crowbar. There are buildings and spaces where the construction must withstand gunfire or the shock wave of an explosion.
The solutions in this category - bulletproof (ballistic) and blast-resistant windows - constitute an extremely specialised, technically demanding niche market. Every engineer or architect undertaking such a project must understand the critical differences from conventional security windows. Let's cover the fundamentals.
The most common confusion in the market is equating burglar resistance with ballistic protection. These are entirely different categories, with entirely different testing standards and practical applications.
Classes RC1 through RC6 (per EN 1627) measure how long the window withstands physical attack with hand tools (screwdriver, crowbar, drill, etc.). Even an RC6 window, which resists a crowbar and reciprocating saw for 20 minutes, offers zero protection against a bullet.
Ballistic certification is governed by EN 1522 (frame) and EN 1523 (glass). Classes FB1 through FB7 define the type of ammunition the window must stop: from a 9 mm Parabellum handgun (FB1) up to a 7.62×51 mm NATO assault rifle (FB7).
A conventional aluminium or PVC frame is incapable of stopping a bullet, nor can it withstand the enormous pressure of a blast wave. The materials change:
The top choice for maximum ballistic protection. Heavy-duty steel profiles are the most reliable (and heaviest) solution available on the market today. Steel is absolutely essential for the highest classes and for blast-resistant windows, since only steel can absorb the enormous kinetic energy of high-velocity projectiles and fragments.
For the lower classes (FB1–FB3), specially reinforced aluminium alloys with much thicker walls and internal steel inserts are available. They are lighter, but they cannot match the ballistic capability of pure steel.
A mistake frequently made by non-specialist engineers is focusing only on the glass. They pay for expensive bulletproof glass but install a standard, lightweight frame. This invalidates the entire protection scheme. An attacker will not shoot through the FB7 glass if they can pierce the non-ballistic frame next to it.
⚠️ Critical Security Rule: The ballistic class of the complete window always equals the class of its weakest element. If the glass is FB4 but the frame only rates as FB2, the overall window class is FB2. Therefore - the frame must be certified to the same (or higher) class as the glazing.
Beyond bullets, there is the category of windows that must withstand explosion shock waves. These are tested under EN 13123 / EN 13124 or ISO 16933. The challenge here is not stopping a projectile, but withstanding enormous pressure (measured in kPa) without the window being "launched" into the room, killing occupants with spall fragments.
Blast-resistant windows are anchored to the masonry or concrete via specially calculated reaction frames, designed to transfer the shock-wave forces into the building's structural system.
Under certain standards, the window may deform, but it must never "break" by projecting fragments into the interior. The design relies on dynamic analysis principles, controlling the maximum rebound velocity of the element after the blast.
Ballistic and blast-resistant windows are not a "luxury" - they are an absolute necessity for embassies, banks, energy stations, military facilities, police stations, data centres and high-risk VIP residences. Their correct design always requires certified manufacturers, highly specialised security engineers and strict end-to-end certification per EN 1522/1523 or EN 13123/13124.
💡 Key Takeaway: RC ≠ FB. Resistance is measured by the weakest link - frame, glass and anchorage must meet the same ballistic class (EN 1522/1523).
Return to category.
Go to categoryReturn to the central guide.
Go to guide