You're in the middle of a renovation and the budget is starting to spiral. You look at your old windows (which may work perfectly well mechanically) and make the perfectly logical thought: "Since the problem with the cold is the single pane, why rip out the whole frame, spend thousands of euros and patch up the walls? Can't I just swap the single pane for a new double energy-efficient unit in the same frame?"
It is by far the most common question we receive from homeowners looking for a low-cost energy upgrade.
The answer, however, is not a simple "yes" or "no". Technically, it sometimes works. In practice, however, it is most often the biggest mistake you can make. Let us be honest and see why physics (and geometry) put up their own barriers.
The first and biggest obstacle is purely spatial. An old single pane is 4 to 5 millimetres thick. A modern, high-performance double energy unit starts at 20 millimetres and easily reaches 24 or 28 millimetres. How will something so "thick" fit into a rebate designed for something so thin?
The glass is held on the sash by a removable profile that clips around the perimeter - called a "glazing bead". In theory, if the fabricator removes the old, wide bead (that held the thin pane) and finds a new, much narrower bead from the same aluminium series, the double unit could fit. But that is only the beginning of the problem.
A double energy unit weighs approximately 20–25 kg per square metre versus 5–6 kg for a single pane. The old frame - hinges, screws, skeleton - was designed for just a few kilograms. Quadrupling the weight means the mechanism will be strained every time you open the window. The hinges will start to sag, the seal will be lost, and wear will come much faster.
If you have the classic old wooden windows from the 1970s or 1980s with single glazing and putty (or a wooden bead), replacing with double energy glass is almost impossible or technically destructive.
The wooden sash doesn't have the depth (the rebate) to accept a 24mm unit. To make it fit, the carpenter would need to rout away the timber, weakening the skeleton that is already fighting woodworm and decades of ageing.
The weight of the double unit (20+ kg per square metre) will destroy the old hinges. The window will sag, won't close properly, and will let air through from every side.
Don't attempt it. The cost of modifications (routing, repainting) will approach that of a brand-new, modern window - with a final result that is aesthetically mediocre and functionally questionable.
Let's say you have 1990s aluminium windows (casement or sliding) that originally took single glazing. You find narrow beads, swap them, and manage to squeeze in a top-spec double energy (Low-E) unit. Why have you wasted your money?
Old aluminium profiles are "Cold" (non-thermally-broken). They lack the thermal break (the polyamide bridge that stops heat transfer). Aluminium, as a metal, is an excellent conductor of heat.
Your new glass will indeed block heat from escaping through the pane. However, the entire aluminium frame will remain frozen! Your home's warmth will "escape" en masse through the metal itself. When the warm air hits the frozen aluminium, it will condense. Your aluminium frames will drip water from inside and the wall around the window will fill with black mould.
It's like wearing an expensive, insulated jacket but walking barefoot in the snow. The cold will find its way - through the frame, not through the glass.
Replacing the glass while keeping the existing frames is an excellent and "smart" investment ONLY in these two cases:
You already have thermally broken (modern) aluminium or PVC, but with plain (non-energy) double glazing. Many contractors in the early 2000s installed good aluminium profiles, but to cut costs, fitted plain white double-glazed units (without Low-E coating and without Argon gas). Here, replacing the plain units with NEW energy double glazing is the ultimate move. The beads already fit, the cost is low, and the energy upgrade will be dramatic!
Your existing double glazing has fogged up (taken on moisture), as we described in the previous article. In this case, replacing the unit (with the same thickness) is the only option - an ideal low-cost solution that fully restores functionality and energy performance.
The frame and glazing unit work as one unified, inseparable system. Trying to "marry" 2024 technology (energy glass) with a cold, non-insulating 1990s frame will give you an illusion of savings, but will create massive condensation problems, mould and wall deterioration.
First assess whether your frames can handle the upgrade. If you have modern thermally broken profiles, replacing only the glass is an excellent move. If not, full replacement is always the smartest long-term investment - the small extra cost is quickly offset by dramatically lower energy bills and the resolution of moisture problems.
Return to category.
Go to categoryReturn to the central guide.
Go to guide
